Executive Summary

Children across the United States and the globe are struggling at unprecedented rates. Anxiety, depression, behavioral disorders, and executive functioning deficits are rising year over year, yet the systems designed to help — parenting models, schools, and mental health treatment — are largely failing to produce lasting change.

The reason is not a lack of effort. The reason is a missing foundational step: nervous system regulation.

We are facing what I call The Regulation Gap. This is the disconnect between the demands placed on a child and the actual capacity of their nervous system to meet those demands. When a child is dysregulated, their brain operates from a stress response state in which the prefrontal cortex — the seat of impulse control, reasoning, and emotional regulation — goes offline. Attempting to correct behavior, teach coping skills, or deliver consequences in that state is not only ineffective; it often makes things worse.

Traditional parenting and therapeutic models fail because they skip regulation. They assume the child has the neurological capacity to listen, reflect, and apply skills. But a dysregulated child is not choosing to misbehave. They are physiologically overwhelmed.

Based on over 10,000 Quantitative Electroencephalograms (QEEGs), there is clear, objective, physiological evidence that the behaviors we label as defiance, anxiety, ADHD, and emotional dysregulation are rooted in measurable patterns of nervous system dysregulation. This is not a theory. It is visible in the brain.

Regulation First Parenting® is a science-backed paradigm shift that fills this critical gap. By establishing nervous system stabilization as the non-negotiable first step — before connection, before correction, before any cognitive intervention — we can address the root cause of the child mental health crisis and build the lasting resilience that children, families, and communities desperately need.

For decades, the dominant approach to child behavior has been compliance-based: set clear expectations, deliver consistent consequences, use reward systems, and correct misbehavior promptly. These approaches are not without value. But they share a critical flaw — they assume the child is regulated enough to respond to them.

When a child is in a stress response state, they are not capable of the cognitive processing that behavior-first interventions require. Consequences do not teach regulation. Reward charts do not build nervous system capacity. Lectures about choices do not reach a brain that is in survival mode. In fact, trauma and emotional dysregulation can directly interfere with the development of emotion regulation and interpersonal skills, leaving the child vulnerable to being emotionally overwhelmed by everyday stressors (Paulus, Ohmann, Möhler, Plener, & Popow, 2021).

The same limitation applies to clinical treatment. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and Exposure and Response Prevention (ERP) are widely used evidence-based approaches. Each of them relies on the child's ability to identify thoughts, challenge beliefs, tolerate discomfort, and apply learned skills. These are executive functioning tasks. And executive functioning collapses under stress (Zelazo, Blair, & Willoughby, 2016).

"Chronic stress and anxiety, often due to family, school, or health issues, is one of the biggest risk factors for executive dysfunction throughout the life span, particularly in children, for whom the executive functions that help us to manage stress have not yet matured." (Calderon, 2020)

This is why so many parents report the same frustrating pattern: their child goes to therapy, seems to understand the concepts, but cannot use the tools when it matters most. As Keeshin, Bryant, and Gargaro (2021) note, exploring the presence of trauma reminders is pertinent, because trauma reminders are often innocuous, everyday events that trigger behavioral outbursts in emotionally dysregulated youth. The child is not resistant. The child is dysregulated. And a dysregulated brain cannot access the prefrontal cortex skills that therapy requires.

The problem is not the therapy. The problem is the missing foundation: regulation.

To understand why regulation must come first, we need to understand what happens in the brain when a child is stressed.

The autonomic nervous system (ANS) is the body's threat-detection and response system. According to Polyvagal Theory, developed by Dr. Stephen Porges, the nervous system operates in a hierarchy of responses (Caffrey, 2023):

1. Ventral Vagal (Safe): Supports social engagement, learning, and connection.
2. Sympathetic (Threat): Activates the fight-or-flight response.
3. Dorsal Vagal (Extreme Threat): Triggers shutdown, collapse, or dissociation.

Critically, this threat detection process, which Porges calls "neuroception," is involuntary (Caffrey, 2023). The child is not choosing to go into fight-or-flight. Their nervous system is responding automatically to perceived danger. This is why telling a dysregulated child to "calm down" or "use your words" is physiologically ineffective — the part of the brain that processes language and makes rational choices is not fully online.

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is the brain's executive control center. It is responsible for impulse control, emotional regulation, decision-making, working memory, and flexible thinking. The PFC is highly interconnected with the amygdala, which drives the stress response. When the amygdala signals threat, it effectively hijacks the PFC (Zelazo, Blair, & Willoughby, 2016). As McEwen (2007) explains, the brain is the organ that interprets experiences as threatening or non-threatening, and the acute and chronic effects of stressful experiences directly influence how it responds.

The stress response itself is a cascade. Any disruption to homeostasis activates the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary (SAM) axis and the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis, releasing adrenaline and cortisol (Chu et al., 2024). The SAM axis produces the rapid fight-or-flight response. The HPA axis produces a slower cortisol release that peaks 15 to 25 minutes after stress induction and can take an hour to return to baseline. This means that even after the triggering event is over, the child's body is still flooded with stress hormones — making regulation, learning, and behavior change physiologically impossible in the short term.

This is not a character issue. It is a brain-state issue.

One of the most powerful aspects of the Regulation First framework is that it is grounded in objective, measurable data. Quantitative Electroencephalography (QEEG) is a tool that maps brainwave activity across the cortex, providing a window into how the brain is actually functioning — not how we assume it is functioning.

Over more than 30 years of clinical practice, Dr. Roseann Capanna-Hodge has conducted and reviewed more than 10,000 QEEGs. What these brain maps reveal, consistently and across thousands of children and adolescents, is that the behaviors we label as ADHD, anxiety, depression, defiance, and emotional dysregulation are associated with measurable, identifiable patterns of nervous system dysregulation.

Research confirms what these clinical observations show. Elevated beta wave activity in the temporal lobes — particularly at the T3 and T4 sites — is significantly associated with anxiety, fear, insecurity, and panic. In one study, 89.6% of individuals with elevated temporal beta waves reported anxiety, and 84.4% reported fear, compared to rates of 8.4% and 4.4% in control groups (Ribas et al., 2018). An excess alpha wave pattern is strongly associated with the co-occurrence of internalizing disorders such as anxiety, depression, and emotional dysregulation (Kopańska & Trojniak, 2025).

These patterns are not random. They are the brain's response to chronic stress, trauma, and dysregulation. They are visible. They are measurable. And they explain why behavior-first interventions fail — because the brain driving the behavior is not in a state that can respond to them.

The QEEG data also reveals the impact of environmental stressors. Stress has been demonstrated to affect higher cognitive activities including decision-making and working memory, with EEG frequency domain analysis showing that the brain's oscillatory activity changes in distinct patterns under stress (Yan et al., 2024). When a child's brain is chronically operating in a stress state, these changes become entrenched — creating the patterns of dysregulation that parents and clinicians observe as persistent behavior problems.

Children today are navigating a world that their nervous systems were not designed for. The cumulative load of modern stressors — academic pressure, social comparison, sensory overload, disrupted sleep, nutritional deficits, and above all, screen exposure — is overwhelming developing regulatory systems.

Compounded Stressors and Bidirectional Co-Dysregulation

Dysregulation rarely occurs in isolation; it is driven by the compounding effect of multiple stressors. Chronic stress and adverse childhood experiences create an "allostatic load"—cumulative wear and tear on the nervous system that progressively impairs emotional regulation and physiological health (Finlay et al., 2022). For children, this means that academic pressures, sensory overload, and social challenges do not act independently; they compound to overwhelm the nervous system's capacity.

Crucially, this compounded stress is bidirectional between parent and child. A child's internalizing and externalizing problems act as chronic stressors that increase parental emotional dysregulation, while parental dysregulation simultaneously impairs the child's ability to learn and practice emotion regulation (Wang et al., 2025). When a dysregulated child interacts with a stressed, dysregulated parent, the result is co-dysregulation—a vicious cycle where each nervous system escalates the other. This bidirectional effect demonstrates why treating the child in isolation often fails; the family system itself must be regulated.

Sleep and Emotional Regulation

Sleep is one of the most powerful regulators of the nervous system, and it is one of the most disrupted. Disturbances of the circadian rhythm and sleep are directly associated with affect dysregulation, increased substance use, and risky behaviors in adolescents (Paulus, Ohmann, Möhler, Plener, & Popow, 2021). A child who is not sleeping well is a child whose nervous system cannot recover from the stressors of the day — creating a cycle of dysregulation that compounds over time.

Sensory Overload and Nutrition

Many children with dysregulation also struggle with sensory processing challenges that affect eating, learning, and daily functioning. Sensory defensiveness, particularly in the tactile domain, is associated with food avoidance and the kind of mealtime battles that exhaust families (Fonseca et al., 2024). Furthermore, neurodevelopmental disorders like Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are highly comorbid with these sensory-based feeding issues (Fonseca et al., 2024). These are not picky eaters making bad choices. These are children whose nervous systems are overwhelmed by sensory input.

Device Dysregulation®

Perhaps the most significant and underappreciated driver of dysregulation in today's children is screen exposure. Digital devices activate dopamine and reward pathways, providing instant emotional relief that substitutes for — and ultimately undermines — the development of internal regulation capacity (Pető et al., 2024).

The research is clear: screen time at a younger age is negatively associated with later self-regulation and executive function (Pető et al., 2024). Adolescents with more than two hours of screen time per day show increased symptoms of anxiety and depression and decreased wellbeing (Khan, Lee, & Horwood, 2022). Girls are particularly susceptible to developing socioemotional problems with greater screen use, while boys are more likely to increase screen use when facing socioemotional challenges (Vasconcellos et al., 2025).

Most critically, when parents use devices to manage a child's emotions — a pattern called Parental Digital Emotion Regulation — they inadvertently prevent the child from developing the internal regulatory mechanisms they need. For children with immature self-regulatory skills, dependence on devices to regulate emotions directly interferes with the development of those skills (Pető et al., 2024). The result is a child who cannot tolerate frustration, cannot transition off screens without a meltdown, and cannot self-soothe without external stimulation.

This is Device Dysregulation® — and it is one of the defining challenges of raising children in the digital age.

Self-regulation does not arrive fully formed. It is grown — slowly, through years of co-regulation, scaffolded practice, and neurological development.

The prefrontal cortex, which houses executive functioning skills, does not fully mature until the mid-20s. This is not a flaw in children's design. It is a biological reality that has profound implications for how we parent and how we treat. Executive function refers to the cognitive processes that enable individuals to manage and regulate their thoughts, actions, and emotions, including planning, attention control, working memory, problem-solving, and task switching (Jensen, 2024). Most models of executive functioning include working memory, attention, task shifting, and response inhibition as key components of executive control (McLean, 2017). These skills are crucial for goal-directed behavior — and they are precisely the skills that collapse under stress.

Neurobiological evidence shows that Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) can significantly impair the structure and function of the prefrontal cortex, affecting cognitive control and strategic thinking (Jensen, 2024). Trauma exposure influences all three core EF components — inhibition, working memory, and cognitive flexibility — making it harder for children who have experienced adversity to regulate, learn, and behave in the ways we expect (Jensen, 2024).

The medial prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex modulate the amygdala's response to threat. When these areas are underactive — as they are under chronic stress — the amygdala is disinhibited, producing the emotional reactivity, hypervigilance, and behavioral dysregulation that characterize so many of the children seen in clinical practice (Lanius, Frewen, Vermetten, & Yehuda, 2010).

The practical implication is this: when a child cannot use their coping skills, it is not because they are choosing not to. It is because the neurological infrastructure for those skills is temporarily or chronically offline. The answer is not more skills training. The answer is nervous system regulation first.

Regulation First Parenting® is a neuroscience-informed framework that establishes nervous system stabilization as the non-negotiable foundation of effective parenting and mental health treatment. It is built on a clear, evidence-based sequence:

1. Regulate

The adult stabilizes their own nervous system first. A dysregulated adult cannot co-regulate a dysregulated child. The adult's calm is the intervention.

2. Connect

Once the adult is regulated, they create safety and connection for the child. This is the co-regulation step — the biological bridge that allows the child's nervous system to shift from threat to safety. Connection is not permissiveness. It is the neurological prerequisite for learning.

3. Correct

Once the child's nervous system is stable enough to access their prefrontal cortex, boundaries, expectations, and accountability can be effectively delivered. Correction delivered in a regulated state is absorbed. Correction delivered in a dysregulated state is escalation.

Without regulation, nothing works. Not consequences. Not therapy. Not medication. Not rewards. Not lectures. Regulation is not one tool among many. It is the foundation upon which every other tool depends.

The Regulation First® framework does not abandon structure, boundaries, or accountability. It sequences them correctly — so they can actually work.

We can no longer afford to treat nervous system dysregulation as a behavioral issue. The cost of continuing with behavior-first and medication-first models is profound.

1. The Human Cost: Children who remain chronically dysregulated are at significantly higher risk for long-term anxiety, depression, substance abuse, and academic failure. They spend their formative years in survival mode rather than learning mode.
2. The Family Cost: Parents of dysregulated children experience severe burnout, marital strain, and chronic stress. The family ecosystem becomes organized around crisis management rather than connection.
3. The Systemic Cost: Schools are overwhelmed by behavioral disruptions that traditional discipline cannot fix. The mental health system is backlogged with children who are receiving therapies they cannot neurologically access.

Addressing the Regulation Gap is not just a clinical preference; it is a public health imperative. If we do not build nervous system capacity first, the investments we make in education and mental health will continue to yield diminishing returns.

The science is clear. The need is urgent. What is required now is a standardized, scalable pathway for implementation.

The CALMS Dysregulation Protocol® is that pathway. Developed by Dr. Roseann Capanna-Hodge, the CALMS Dysregulation Protocol® is a comprehensive, science-based training framework designed to equip parents, educators, and clinicians with the knowledge and tools to implement Regulation First® principles across all settings.

The protocol provides a practical, usable roadmap for adults to stabilize a child's nervous system:

CALMS Dysregulation Protocol®

• C - Co-regulate first: Before addressing behavior, the adult must anchor their own nervous system and bring calm to the interaction. Co-regulation is the biological bridge to the child's self-regulation.
• A - Avoid personalizing: Recognize that the child's dysregulated behavior is a stress response, not an intentional attack. This neurophysiological reframing prevents adult escalation.
• L - Look for root causes: Identify the environmental, sensory, or physiological stressors (such as sleep deficits or Device Dysregulation®) that are driving the nervous system into fight-or-flight.
• M - Model coping strategies: Demonstrate regulated behavior and healthy stress management in real-time, providing the child with a visible template for nervous system recovery.
• S - Support and reinforce: Build long-term regulation capacity through consistent boundaries, connection, and proactive nervous system support.

Through the CALMS Protocol® Certification, practitioners are trained to:

• Understand the neuroscience of dysregulation and the stress response
• Assess nervous system state before any behavioral or cognitive intervention
• Apply the C.A.L.M.S. Dysregulation Protocol® to stabilize the child's nervous system
• Build regulation capacity over time through consistent, dysregulation-informed practice
• Create environments — at home, in school, and in clinical settings — that support nervous system health

The goal is not simply to train individuals. It is to build dysregulation-informed systems — schools, clinical practices, and families that operate from a shared understanding that regulation comes first.

By standardizing this framework and making it accessible at scale, we can change the trajectory of children's mental health. We can reduce the rates of anxiety, depression, and behavioral disorders that are devastating a generation. We can give parents the tools they actually need. We can give clinicians a foundation that makes their work more effective. And we can give children what they deserve: a nervous system that is supported, not overwhelmed.

The missing piece in parenting and mental health treatment is regulation. Regulation First® is the answer.

Dr. Roseann Capanna-Hodge, Ed.D., LPC, BCN is a pediatric mental health expert, licensed professional counselor, and Board Certified in Neurofeedback with more than 30 years of clinical experience. She is the founder of Regulation First Parenting® and the creator of the CALMS Protocol®. Dr. Roseann has conducted and reviewed more than 10,000 QEEGs and is the author of The Dysregulated Kid: The Parenting Playbook for Helping Your Child Find Calm in a Chaotic World. She is the host of the Dysregulated Kids podcast and a leading voice in the movement to make nervous system regulation the foundation of parenting and mental health care.

Learn more at www.drroseann.com

References

Beauchaine, T. P., Gatzke-Kopp, L., & Mead, H. K. (2007). Polyvagal Theory and developmental psychopathology: Emotion dysregulation and conduct problems from preschool to adolescence. Biological Psychology, 74(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.08.008

Caffrey, C. (2023). Polyvagal theory. EBSCO Research Starters. EBSCO Information Services. https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/health-and-medicine/polyvagal-theory

Calderon, J. (2020, December 16). Executive function in children: Why it matters and how to help. Harvard Health Blog. https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/executive-function-in-children-why-it-matters-and-how-to-help-202012162348

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2025, June 5). Data and statistics on children's mental health. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. https://www.cdc.gov/children-mental-health/data-research/index.html

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2024). Youth Risk Behavior Survey Data Summary & Trends Report: 2013–2023. https://www.cdc.gov/yrbs/dstr/

Chu, B., Marwaha, K., Sanvictores, T., Awosika, A. O., & Ayers, D. (2024). Physiology, stress reaction. In StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK541120/

De Witte, N. A. J., Sütterlin, S., Braet, C., & Mueller, S. C. (2016). Getting to the heart of emotion regulation in youth: The role of interoceptive sensitivity, heart rate variability, and parental psychopathology. PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0164615. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164615

Finlay, S., et al. (2022). Adverse childhood experiences and allostatic load. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104734

Fonseca, N. K. O., Curtarelli, V. D., Bertoletti, J., et al. (2024). Avoidant restrictive food intake disorder: Recent advances in neurobiology and treatment. Journal of Eating Disorders, 12, 74. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40337-024-01021-z

Graham, R. A., Scott, B. G., & Weems, C. F. (2017). Parenting behaviors, parent heart rate variability, and their associations with adolescent heart rate variability. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 46(5), 1089–1103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-016-0616-x

Jensen, J. (2024). Trauma and executive function: Discovering and developing academic motivation interventions for adolescents in residential mental health treatment [Master's capstone project, Hamline University]. DigitalCommons@Hamline. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2025&context=hse_cp

Keeshin, B. R., Bryant, B. J., & Gargaro, E. R. (2021). Emotional dysregulation: A trauma-informed approach. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 30(2), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chc.2020.10.007

Khan, A., Lee, E.-Y., & Horwood, S. (2022). Adolescent screen time: Associations with school stress and school satisfaction across 38 countries. European Journal of Pediatrics, 181, 2273–2281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-022-04420-z

Kopańska, M., & Trojniak, J. (2025). From aberrant brainwaves to altered plasticity: A review of QEEG biomarkers and neurofeedback in the neurobiological landscape of ADHD. Cells, 14(17), 1339. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14171339

Lanius, R. A., Frewen, P. A., Vermetten, E., & Yehuda, R. (2010). Fear conditioning and early life vulnerabilities: Two distinct pathways of emotional dysregulation and brain dysfunction in PTSD. European Journal of Psychotraumatology, 1. https://doi.org/10.3402/ejpt.v1i0.5467

Leeb, R. T., Danielson, M. L., Claussen, A. H., Robinson, L. R., Lebrun-Harris, L. A., Ghandour, R., et al. (2024). Trends in mental, behavioral, and developmental disorders among children and adolescents in the US, 2016–2021. Preventing Chronic Disease, 21, Article 240142. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd21.240142

McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews, 87(3), 873–904. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00041.2006

McLean, S. (2017). Developmental differences in children who have experienced adversity: Difficulty with executive functioning. Child Family Community Australia, Australian Institute of Family Studies. https://aifs.gov.au/resources/practice-guides/developmental-differences-children-who-have-experienced-adversity-guide-no3

Paulus, F. W., Ohmann, S., Möhler, E., Plener, P., & Popow, C. (2021). Emotional dysregulation in children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders: A narrative review. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 628252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.628252

Pető, A., Fitzpatrick, C., Lévesque, D., Gergely, A., Bognár, Z., Kotsis, K., Barrett, T., Herrmann, E., & Konok, V. (2024). Cure for tantrums? Longitudinal associations between parental digital emotion regulation and children's self-regulatory skills. Frontiers in Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 3, Article 1276154. https://doi.org/10.3389/frcha.2024.1276154

Ribas, V. R., Ribas, R. G., Nóbrega, J. A., da Nóbrega, M. V., Espécie, J. A. A., Calafange, M. T., Calafange, C. O. M., & Martins, H. A. L. (2018). Pattern of anxiety, insecurity, fear, panic and/or phobia observed by quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG). Dementia & Neuropsychologia, 12(3), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-57642018dn12-030007

Sappenfield, O., Alberto, C., Minnaert, J., Donney, J., Lebrun-Harris, L., & Ghandour, R. (2024). Adolescent mental and behavioral health, 2023 (Data Brief). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, Maternal and Child Health Bureau. https://mchb.hrsa.gov/sites/default/files/mchb/data-research/nsch-data-brief-adolescent-mental-behavioral-health-2023.pdf

Vasconcellos, R. P., Sanders, T., Lonsdale, C., Parker, P., Conigrave, J., Tang, S., del Pozo Cruz, B., Biddle, S. J. H., Taylor, R., Innes-Hughes, C., Salmela-Aro, K., Vasconcellos, D., Wilhite, K., Tremaine, E., Booker, B., & Noetel, M. (2025). Electronic screen use and children's socioemotional problems: A systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 151(5), 513–543. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000468

Verlenden, J. V., Fodeman, A., Wilkins, N., Everett Jones, S., Moore, S., Cornett, K., Sims, V., Saelee, R., & Brener, N. D. (2024). Mental health and suicide risk among high school students and protective factors — Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2023. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) Supplement, 73(4), 79–86. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/73/su/su7304a9.htm

Wang, X., et al. (2025). Bidirectional longitudinal relationships between parents' dysregulation, children's emotion regulation and children's internalizing problem. Children and Youth Services Review, 170, 108169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108169

Yan, B., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Wu, D., Sun, K., & Xiao, W. (2024). EEG evidence of acute stress enhancing inhibition control by increasing attention. Brain Sciences, 14(10), 1013. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci14101013

Zelazo, P. D., Blair, C. B., & Willoughby, M. T. (2016). Executive function: Implications for education (NCER 2017-2000). National Center for Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. https://ies.ed.gov/ncer/pubs/20172000/pdf/20172000.pdf

Zablotsky, B., & Ng, A. E. (2023). Mental health treatment among children aged 5–17 years: United States, 2021 (NCHS Data Brief No. 472). National Center for Health Statistics. https://doi.org/10.15620/cdc:128144

‍

Disclaimer: This article is not intended to give health advice and it is recommended to consult with a physician before beginning any new wellness regime. *The effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment vary by patient and condition. Dr. Roseann Capanna-Hodge, LLC does not guarantee certain results.

‍

© Roseann-Capanna-Hodge 2026

‍